Share:

RTE 907L over SOUTH STREET, RTE 907L

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.70813, -73.99994
40°42'29" N, 73°59'60" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE 907L over SOUTH STREET, RTE 907L
Structure number:00000000223201B
Location:.9 MI NE FDR DR+BATTERY
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:84.0 ft. [25.6 m]
Total length:594.8 ft. [181.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:18.0 ft. [5.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:22.6 ft. [6.9 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.4 ft. [4.7 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1954
Year reconstructed:2014
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:7
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Closed Grating [4]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:40.9 tons [37.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:25.0 tons [22.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:65.2
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$6,303,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201565.2Not deficientSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory-
February 201456.1Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory40728
February 201257.9Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory40728
July 201149.3Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory40728
April 201059.3Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory40728
February 200859.3Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory40728
April 200648.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory40728
February 200457.9Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory40728
March 200255.4Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory40728
February 200041.1Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory40728
February 199816.1Structurally deficientPoorPoorFair40728
May 199716.1Structurally deficientPoorPoorFair40728
March 199619.5Structurally deficientPoorSeriousPoor40728
April 19959.5Structurally deficientPoorSeriousPoor40728
May 19942.0Structurally deficientPoorSeriousPoor40728
May 19932.0Structurally deficientPoorSeriousPoor40728
September 19922.0Structurally deficientPoorSeriousPoor40728
July 19912.0Structurally deficientPoorSeriousPoor40728