Share:

RTE 907L over RTE 907L, PROM BIN223216

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.77382, -73.94413
40°46'26" N, 73°56'39" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE 907L over RTE 907L, PROM BIN223216
Structure number:000000002232158
Location:1.3 MI NE FDR DR & SH 25
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:45.9 ft. [14.0 m]
Total length:1428.9 ft. [435.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:38.1 ft. [11.6 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:12.8 ft. [3.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:12.8 ft. [3.9 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1942
Year reconstructed:1992
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Number of main spans:32
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Girder and floorbeam system [03]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:135,889 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:62.4 tons [56.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:26.2 tons [23.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:55.1
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$50,756,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201555.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory135889
May 201353.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory157421
May 201153.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory157421
June 200959.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood78455
June 20071.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory78455
May 20051.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair157421
June 20031.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair143953
November 20011.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair139160
October 20001.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair139160
December 19991.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySerious130319
November 19981.0Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSerious156961
November 19970.0Not deficientFairSatisfactorySerious154905
November 19960.0Not deficientPoorSeriousSerious154905
November 19950.0Not deficientPoorSeriousSerious154905
November 19940.0Not deficientPoorFairSerious138497
December 19920.0Not deficientPoorFairSerious123150
November 19911.0Structurally deficient-SeriousSerious123150