RTE 907L over RTE 907L, EAST 62ND STRE


+40.76015, -73.95754
40°45'37" N, 73°57'27" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE 907L over RTE 907L, EAST 62ND STRE
Structure number:000000002233038
Location:.2 MI SW JCT FDR DR.&SH25
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Total length:1585.1 ft. [483.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:37.1 ft. [11.3 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:12.5 ft. [3.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:12.5 ft. [3.8 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1941
Year reconstructed:2006
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:34
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:157,421 [as of 2004]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:61.8 tons [56.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:37.0 tons [33.6 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:75.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$33,041,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
November 201475.0Not deficientExcellentVery GoodVery Good157421
December 201275.0Not deficientExcellentVery GoodVery Good157421
December 201075.0Not deficientExcellentVery GoodVery Good157421
December 200875.0Not deficientExcellentVery GoodVery Good57482
October 200675.0Not deficientExcellentVery GoodVery Good157421
March 200615.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor157421
July 200415.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor157421
August 200315.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor133325
June 200215.0Structurally deficientSeriousSeriousSerious133325
May 200115.0Structurally deficientSeriousSeriousPoor133325
June 200015.0Structurally deficientSeriousSeriousSerious133325
20000.0Not applicable---10200
April 199815.0Structurally deficientSeriousSeriousSerious133325
June 199715.0Structurally deficientPoorSeriousSerious133325
May 199629.2Structurally deficient-SeriousSerious133325
July 199529.2Structurally deficient-SeriousSerious133325
October 199429.2Structurally deficient-SeriousSerious133325
July 199329.2Structurally deficient-SeriousSerious133325
July 199229.2Structurally deficient-SeriousSerious133325
July 199129.2Structurally deficient-SeriousSerious133325