E.60thST toFDR NB over RTE 907L


+40.75867, -73.95859
40°45'31" N, 73°57'31" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:E.60thST toFDR NB over RTE 907L
Structure number:000000002233040
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:57.7 ft. [17.6 m]
Total length:727.1 ft. [221.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:34.1 ft. [10.4 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.1 ft. [4.0 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1941
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Number of main spans:17
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:36 [as of 2001]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:55.3 tons [50.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:14.7 tons [13.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:37.0
Recommended work:Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36]
Estimated cost of work:$35,727,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201537.0Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor36
July 201437.0Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor36
July 201337.0Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor36
July 201235.0Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor36
July 201155.6Structurally deficientFairPoorFair36
July 201040.7Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor6554
August 200940.7Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor6554
May 200814.9Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor6554
July 200737.0Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor36
June 200637.0Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor36
July 200539.0Structurally deficient-PoorPoor36
May 200433.0Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor36
August 200333.0Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor36
May 200216.4Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor285
April 200131.3Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor285
June 200031.3Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor285
June 199916.4Structurally deficientFairSeriousSerious285
March 199816.4Structurally deficientFairSeriousPoor285
May 199716.4Structurally deficientPoorSeriousSerious285
June 199615.9Structurally deficientPoorSeriousSerious285
July 199516.0Structurally deficientPoorSeriousSerious300
September 199416.0Structurally deficientPoorSeriousSerious300
June 199316.0Structurally deficientPoorSeriousSerious300
August 199216.0Structurally deficientPoorSeriousSerious300
August 199116.0Structurally deficientFairSeriousSerious300