Share:

RTE 907P over Harlem River DR N, RTE 9

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.79994, -73.92989
40°47'60" N, 73°55'48" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE 907P over Harlem River DR N, RTE 9
Structure number:00000000224005A
Location:OVER HARLEM RVR IN HARLEM
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:105.0 ft. [32.0 m]
Total length:816.0 ft. [248.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:31.5 ft. [9.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:34.5 ft. [10.5 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:2010
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:11
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:61,022 [as of 2001]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:92.7 tons [84.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:44.9 tons [40.8 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:82.6
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$15,892,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
November 201482.6Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent61022
November 201282.6Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent61022
December 201084.7Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent61022
June 200850.7Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory61022
June 200650.7Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory61022
August 200436.8Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory61022
June 200241.3Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory20000
June 200041.3Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory20000
March 199849.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory20000
June 199617.4Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor20000
June 19950.0Structurally deficientPoorSeriousPoor20000
August 19940.0Structurally deficientPoorSeriousPoor20000
June 19920.0Structurally deficientPoorSeriousPoor20000
June 19900.0Structurally deficientSeriousSeriousPoor20000