Share:

CROPSEY AVENUE over CONEY ISLAND CRK

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.58180, -73.98586
40°34'54" N, 73°59'09" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CROPSEY AVENUE over CONEY ISLAND CRK
Structure number:000000002240302
Location:AT CONEY ISLAND
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:154.9 ft. [47.2 m]
Total length:204.7 ft. [62.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:45.6 ft. [13.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:3280.7 ft. [999.9 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1930
Year reconstructed:1951
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Girder and floorbeam system [03]
Deck type:Closed Grating [4]
Wearing surface:Epoxy Overlay [5]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:15,684 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Pier/abutment protection:In place but in a deteriorated condition [3]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:81.4 tons [74.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:32.3 tons [29.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:62.7
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$12,245,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201562.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryFair15684
October 201461.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryFair31367
December 201360.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryFair32219
October 201260.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryFair34200
November 201161.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryFair31561
October 201060.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryFair35098
July 200960.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryFair35098
October 200860.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryFair35098
October 200761.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryFair31029
August 200661.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryFair31561
August 200561.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryFair31561
September 200461.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryFair31561
June 200361.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryFair31561
July 200257.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryFair26593
June 200157.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryFair26593
October 200069.1Functionally obsoleteExcellentSatisfactorySatisfactory26593
September 199968.0Functionally obsoleteExcellentSatisfactorySatisfactory26593
October 199869.1Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory26593
September 199649.0Structurally deficientVery GoodPoorPoor16385
April 199619.7Structurally deficientSeriousSeriousPoor16385
October 199419.7Structurally deficientSeriousSeriousPoor16385
September 199319.7Structurally deficientSeriousSeriousPoor16385
June 199241.7Structurally deficientSeriousPoorFair16385
July 199119.7Structurally deficientSeriousSeriousFair16385