Share:

LEGGETT AVENUE over AMTRAK/CSXT/P&W

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.81279, -73.89781
40°48'46" N, 73°53'52" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:LEGGETT AVENUE over AMTRAK/CSXT/P&W
Structure number:000000002241139
Location:AT HUNTS POINT
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:196.9 ft. [60.0 m]
Total length:435.7 ft. [132.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:55.4 ft. [16.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:95.1 ft. [29.0 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:17.7 ft. [5.4 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1906
Year reconstructed:1981
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Truss - Thru [10]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Latex Concrete or similar additive [3]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:17,419 [as of 1998]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:79.4 tons [72.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:26.8 tons [24.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:63.4
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$3,826,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
November 201463.4Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory17419
October 201263.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory17419
December 201063.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory17419
December 200863.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory17419
August 200663.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory17419
August 200463.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory17419
June 200263.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory17419
June 200068.5Not deficientVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory17419
December 199868.5Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory17419
July 199633.8Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorPoor19306
October 199437.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorPoor16400
November 199237.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorPoor16400
August 199037.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorPoor16400