Share:

LAFAYETTE AVENUE over AMTRAK/CSXT/P&W

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.81621, -73.89356
40°48'58" N, 73°53'37" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:LAFAYETTE AVENUE over AMTRAK/CSXT/P&W
Structure number:000000002241169
Location:AT HUNTS POINT
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:119.8 ft. [36.5 m]
Total length:119.8 ft. [36.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:55.1 ft. [16.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:100.1 ft. [30.5 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:18.0 ft. [5.5 m]
Skew angle:43°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1906
Year reconstructed:2000
Historic significance:Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Truss - Thru [10]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,776 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:73.8 tons [67.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:24.2 tons [22.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:63.1
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$15,222,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
November 201463.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryGood2776
October 201263.1Functionally obsoleteExcellentSatisfactorySatisfactory2800
December 201063.1Functionally obsoleteExcellentSatisfactorySatisfactory3600
December 200863.1Functionally obsoleteExcellentSatisfactorySatisfactory2964
August 200663.1Not deficientExcellentSatisfactorySatisfactory3600
August 200463.1Not deficientExcellentSatisfactorySatisfactory3600
June 200262.6Not deficientExcellentSatisfactorySatisfactory3600
May 200065.6Not deficientExcellentSatisfactorySatisfactory3600
March 200034.3Structurally deficientSeriousSeriousPoor3600
March 199934.3Structurally deficientSeriousSeriousPoor3600
May 199834.3Structurally deficientSeriousSeriousPoor3600
May 199633.6Structurally deficientSeriousSeriousPoor3600
November 199534.9Structurally deficientSeriousSeriousPoor3600
October 199436.3Structurally deficientSeriousPoorPoor3600
December 199338.4Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor3600
October 199240.5Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor3600
August 199038.5Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor3600