Share:

TIFFANY STREET over AMTRAK/CSXT/P&W

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.81732, -73.89241
40°49'02" N, 73°53'33" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:TIFFANY STREET over AMTRAK/CSXT/P&W
Structure number:000000002241170
Location:AT HUNTS POINT
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:86.9 ft. [26.5 m]
Total length:90.9 ft. [27.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:80.1 ft. [24.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:18.7 ft. [5.7 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1908
Year reconstructed:1997
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Main span material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main span design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:10,336 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:100.8 tons [91.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:59.8 tons [54.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:92.5
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$4,332,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
November 201592.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood10336
November 201392.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood5177
November 201192.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood5177
November 200992.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood12230
September 200792.7Functionally obsoleteExcellentVery GoodGood5177
July 200592.6Not deficientExcellentVery GoodGood5177
November 200392.6Not deficientExcellentVery GoodGood5177
August 200196.8Not deficientExcellentVery GoodGood5177
August 199996.8Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood5177
October 199777.1Not deficient-Very GoodSatisfactory5177
March 19975.8Structurally deficientSeriousPoorPoor2800
November 19958.1Structurally deficientSeriousPoorPoor2800
November 19948.1Structurally deficientSeriousPoorPoor2800
November 19928.1Structurally deficientSeriousPoorPoor2800
August 199013.2Structurally deficientSeriousPoorPoor2800