Share:

UNION PORT ROAD over AMTRAK/CSXT/P&W

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.84168, -73.86416
40°50'30" N, 73°51'51" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:UNION PORT ROAD over AMTRAK/CSXT/P&W
Structure number:000000002241330
Location:AT WESTCHESTER HEIGHTS
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:123.7 ft. [37.7 m]
Total length:129.9 ft. [39.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:58.7 ft. [17.9 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:17.7 ft. [5.4 m]
Skew angle:33°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1906
Year reconstructed:1981
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Truss - Thru [10]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:5,096 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:73.3 tons [66.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:22.1 tons [20.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:54.5
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$614,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
October 201454.5Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory5096
October 201269.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory5100
September 201069.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory5096
November 200869.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory5614
August 200669.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory5387
August 200469.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory5387
June 200269.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory5677
June 200062.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodFairSatisfactory5677
December 199862.6Functionally obsoleteGoodFairSatisfactory5677
June 199638.3Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorPoor5000
December 199438.6Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorPoor5000
November 199238.6Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorPoor5000
August 199037.3Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorPoor5000