Share:

RTE 1 over METRO NO COMMUTER

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.86130, -73.89068
40°51'41" N, 73°53'26" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE 1 over METRO NO COMMUTER
Structure number:000000002241839
Location:AT FORDHAM
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:66.9 ft. [20.4 m]
Total length:69.9 ft. [21.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:555.1 ft. [169.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:596.5 ft. [181.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1889
Year reconstructed:1997
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:35,981 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:95.8 tons [87.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:86.9
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$24,293,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201586.9Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good35981
August 201386.9Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good35981
July 201193.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good3745
August 200993.3Functionally obsoleteExcellentExcellentVery Good3745
November 200793.3Functionally obsoleteExcellentExcellentVery Good3745
June 200593.3Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good3745
June 200393.3Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good3745
November 200197.3Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good3745
October 199997.3Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good3745
July 199772.9Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory8070
May 199628.3Structurally deficientSeriousPoorPoor8070
October 199528.7Structurally deficientSeriousPoorPoor8070
August 199421.0Structurally deficientSeriousPoorSerious23000
September 199321.0Structurally deficientSeriousPoorSerious23000
February 199221.0Structurally deficientSeriousPoorSerious23000