Share:

CONN RD BETWN MOS over METRO NO COMMUTER

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.86844, -73.87956
40°52'06" N, 73°52'46" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CONN RD BETWN MOS over METRO NO COMMUTER
Structure number:000000002241850
Location:E JCT MOSHOLU PKWY & S BL
Purpose:Carries highway over railroad
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:86.0 ft. [26.2 m]
Total length:90.9 ft. [27.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:34.1 ft. [10.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:60.7 ft. [18.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:18.0 ft. [5.5 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1942
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:300 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:52.9 tons [48.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:30.9 tons [28.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:75.1
Recommended work:Bridge deck replacement with only incidental widening. [37]
Estimated cost of work:$6,239,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201475.1Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair300
April 201278.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair300
May 201078.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair300
April 200878.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair300
April 200678.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair300
April 200478.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair300
March 200278.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair300
March 200093.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory300
November 199893.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory300
May 199664.0Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor300
August 199464.0Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor300
October 199266.0Structurally deficientFairFairPoor300
August 199066.0Structurally deficientFairFairPoor300