Share:

WEST 205TH STREET over NYCTA IND YARDS

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.87627, -73.88811
40°52'35" N, 73°53'17" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:WEST 205TH STREET over NYCTA IND YARDS
Structure number:000000002241940
Location:AT KINGSBRIDGE
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:117.8 ft. [35.9 m]
Total length:387.2 ft. [118.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:84.0 ft. [25.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.1 ft. [4.0 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:Other Local Agencies [25]
Year built:1935
Year reconstructed:2000
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Latex Concrete or similar additive [3]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:7,068 [as of 1997]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:97.8 tons [88.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:49.9 tons [45.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:92.6
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$306,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
October 201492.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood7068
November 201292.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood7068
November 201092.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood7068
August 200890.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentGood6972
September 200690.6Not deficientVery GoodExcellentGood7068
September 200490.6Functionally obsoleteExcellentExcellentVery Good7068
July 200290.6Functionally obsoleteExcellentExcellentVery Good7068
November 200094.7Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good7068
October 199978.6Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good7068
December 199832.5Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious7068
November 199730.3Structurally deficientPoorSeriousSerious7068
October 199625.9Structurally deficientPoorSeriousSerious3200
December 199526.3Structurally deficientPoorSeriousSerious3200
January 199430.8Structurally deficientPoorSeriousSerious3200
October 199330.8Structurally deficientPoorSeriousSerious3200
December 199230.8Structurally deficientPoorSeriousSerious3200
September 199130.8Structurally deficientPoorSeriousSerious3200