+40.85801, -73.83080
40°51'29" N, 73°49'51" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE 908A over AMTRAK/CSXT/P&W
Structure number:000000002241959
Location:0.2MI NW JCT BRPC&BPP
Purpose:Carries highway over railroad
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:153.9 ft. [46.9 m]
Total length:155.8 ft. [47.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:83.7 ft. [25.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:99.4 ft. [30.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:18.4 ft. [5.6 m]
Skew angle:55°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1940
Year reconstructed:1997
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Girder and floorbeam system [03]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:78,163 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:69.9 tons [63.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:38.0 tons [34.5 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:90.1
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$792,800,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
October 201490.1Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory78163
May 201290.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryGood78200
June 201090.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryGood78163
November 200890.1Functionally obsoleteExcellentSatisfactoryGood78163
August 200688.1Functionally obsoleteExcellentSatisfactoryGood116879
August 200489.2Not deficientExcellentSatisfactoryGood116879
June 200290.4Not deficientExcellentGoodGood73241
June 200094.5Not deficientExcellentVery GoodVery Good73241
December 199895.0Not deficientExcellentGoodVery Good63116
October 199793.2Not deficientVery GoodGoodSatisfactory57916
August 199619.0Structurally deficientSeriousSeriousPoor57916
November 199519.0Structurally deficientSeriousSeriousPoor57916
December 199419.0Structurally deficientSeriousSeriousPoor78731
December 199339.3Structurally deficientSeriousPoorPoor57916
May 199237.7Structurally deficientSeriousPoorPoor66254
September 199021.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor77617