Share:

GRAND CONCOURSE over BEDFORD PARK BLVD

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.87204, -73.88775
40°52'19" N, 73°53'16" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:GRAND CONCOURSE over BEDFORD PARK BLVD
Structure number:000000002242370
Location:AT KINGSBRIDGE
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:45.9 ft. [14.0 m]
Total length:45.9 ft. [14.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:143.1 ft. [43.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:183.1 ft. [55.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1910
Year reconstructed:1983
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Main span material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main span design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:20,128 [as of 1997]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:75.8 tons [68.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:73.8
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$766,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201473.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair20128
February 201273.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair20128
March 201073.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair20128
April 200873.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair20128
April 200686.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory20128
April 200486.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory20128
May 200286.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory20128
May 200086.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory20128
September 199873.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair20128
October 199678.9Functionally obsolete-FairFair9000
September 199461.7Structurally deficient-FairPoor9000
September 199261.7Structurally deficient-FairPoor9000
May 199061.7Not deficient-SatisfactoryPoor9000