Share:

FIFTH AVENUE over N Y & ATLANTIC/LI, NYCTA

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.63697, -74.01878
40°38'13" N, 74°01'08" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:FIFTH AVENUE over N Y & ATLANTIC/LI, NYCTA
Structure number:000000002243580
Location:AT BOROUGH PARK
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:57.7 ft. [17.6 m]
Total length:185.0 ft. [56.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:66.9 ft. [20.4 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:20.3 ft. [6.2 m]
Skew angle:17°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1914
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Girder and floorbeam system [03]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:7,232 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:53.9 tons [49.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:13.0 tons [11.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:49.8
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$11,626,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
October 201449.8Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairFair7232
September 201330.9Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairFair7253
November 201231.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair7200
September 201131.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairFair7200
January 201130.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair7356
December 200830.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair10064
October 200641.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory7356
October 200441.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory7356
August 200241.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory7356
May 200045.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory7356
July 199859.7Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory7356
April 199633.6Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor9289
July 199434.8Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor7700
April 19926.7Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious7700
March 199028.7Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor7700