Share:

CENTRAL DRIVE over PROSPCT PK STREAM

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.66235, -73.96912
40°39'44" N, 73°58'09" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CENTRAL DRIVE over PROSPCT PK STREAM
Structure number:000000002244050
Location:IN PROSPECT PARK
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:26.9 ft. [8.2 m]
Total length:118.8 ft. [36.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:34.5 ft. [10.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:59.1 ft. [18.0 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1930
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Masonry [8]
Main spans design:Arch - Deck [11]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations (including piles) on dry land well above flood water elevations. [9]
Operating rating:75.1 tons [68.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:32.8 tons [29.8 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:97.6
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$7,513,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201597.6Not deficient-SatisfactoryGood-
May 201397.6Not deficient-SatisfactoryGood100
May 201197.6Not deficient-SatisfactoryGood100
May 200997.6Not deficient-SatisfactoryGood100
April 200797.6Not deficient-SatisfactoryGood100
April 200596.6Not deficient-SatisfactoryGood100
April 200396.6Not deficient-SatisfactoryGood1
April 200196.0Not deficient-SatisfactoryVery Good1
July 199996.0Not deficient-SatisfactoryGood1
June 199784.0Not deficient-SatisfactoryFair1
June 199567.8Structurally deficient-FairPoor1
September 199367.8Structurally deficient-FairPoor1
September 199180.1Functionally obsolete-FairFair1