Share:

WEST DRIVE over FEEDER TO LAKE

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.77791, -73.97257
40°46'40" N, 73°58'21" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:WEST DRIVE over FEEDER TO LAKE
Structure number:000000002246330
Location:IN CENTRAL PARK
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:26.9 ft. [8.2 m]
Total length:26.9 ft. [8.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:33.1 ft. [10.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:67.3 ft. [20.5 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1860
Historic significance:Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1]
Main span material:Masonry [8]
Main span design:Arch - Deck [11]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:5,107 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:53.8 tons [48.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:24.6 tons [22.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:65.3
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$1,944,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201465.3Functionally obsolete-SatisfactorySatisfactory5107
January 201265.3Functionally obsolete-SatisfactorySatisfactory5100
February 201066.9Functionally obsolete-SatisfactorySatisfactory8500
February 200866.9Functionally obsolete-SatisfactorySatisfactory8500
March 200666.9Functionally obsolete-SatisfactorySatisfactory8500
February 200466.9Functionally obsolete-SatisfactorySatisfactory8500
March 200266.7Functionally obsolete-SatisfactorySatisfactory8500
February 200065.7Functionally obsolete-SatisfactorySatisfactory8500
January 199865.7Functionally obsolete-SatisfactorySatisfactory8500
March 199656.7Functionally obsolete-FairFair8500
March 199455.0Functionally obsolete-FairFair8500
March 199241.3Structurally deficient-FairPoor8500
April 199051.2Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryFair8500