Share:

ROOSEVELT AVENUE over CSX TRANS/CP&P&W, IRT RA

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.74655, -73.89458
40°44'48" N, 73°53'40" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:ROOSEVELT AVENUE over CSX TRANS/CP&P&W, IRT RA
Structure number:000000002247380
Location:AT ELMHURST
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Total length:89.9 ft. [27.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:82.4 ft. [25.1 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:12.8 ft. [3.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:12.8 ft. [3.9 m]
Skew angle:15°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1916
Year reconstructed:2007
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:12,000 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:74.8 tons [68.0 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:88.1
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$4,154,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201588.1Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good12000
August 201387.9Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good13058
August 201187.9Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good13058
September 200988.4Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good10294
November 200787.4Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good10294
March 200775.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodFair13058
June 200475.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodFair13058
September 200275.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodFair13058
August 200079.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodFair13058
July 199891.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood13058
July 199661.1Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor16700
May 199460.8Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor16700
July 199260.8Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor16700
September 199089.3Functionally obsoleteFairVery GoodSatisfactory16700