CROSS BAY BLVD over RTE 27, 27 X Nassau Expw


+40.66856, -73.84212
40°40'07" N, 73°50'32" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:CROSS BAY BLVD over RTE 27, 27 X Nassau Expw
Structure number:000000002248039
Location:0.2 NW OF RTE 27 & BSOP
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:63.0 ft. [19.2 m]
Total length:125.3 ft. [38.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:106.0 ft. [32.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:131.9 ft. [40.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:36°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1949
Year reconstructed:2002
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Closed Grating [4]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:59,591 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:81.8 tons [74.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:49.0 tons [44.5 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:62.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$9,312,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201562.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good59591
May 201362.0Functionally obsoleteExcellentExcellentGood59591
June 201162.0Functionally obsoleteExcellentExcellentGood59600
June 200962.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentGood56564
July 200762.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentGood54306
June 200561.0Not deficientVery GoodExcellentGood61031
May 200481.0Functionally obsoleteExcellentExcellentGood61031
June 200350.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor61031
July 200250.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor48669
June 200150.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor48669
May 200058.6Structurally deficientPoorFairFair48669
July 199958.6Structurally deficientPoorFairFair48669
October 199843.6Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor64985
December 199741.0Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor64985
September 199640.9Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor64985
July 199540.9Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor72200
June 199440.9Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor72200
July 199323.9Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious72200
July 199223.9Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious72200
September 199123.9Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious72200