Share:

HUGUENOT AVENUE over SIRT SOUTH SHORE

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.53304, -74.19238
40°31'59" N, 74°11'33" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:HUGUENOT AVENUE over SIRT SOUTH SHORE
Structure number:000000002249300
Location:AT PRINCES BAY
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Total length:88.9 ft. [27.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:38.1 ft. [11.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:73.2 ft. [22.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.7 ft. [5.1 m]
Skew angle:33°
Owner:Other Local Agencies [25]
Year built:1938
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:7,983 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:50.9 tons [46.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:29.9 tons [27.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:87.7
Recommended work:Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36]
Estimated cost of work:$1,649,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201587.7Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood7983
September 201386.3Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood15508
October 201187.3Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood15508
October 200987.4Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood13315
October 200787.3Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood15508
October 200587.3Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood15508
October 200387.3Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood15508
August 200194.4Not deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory12413
August 199963.4Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryFair12413
September 199763.9Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryFair12413
September 199548.1Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor5200
December 199349.8Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor5200
September 199149.8Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor5200