Share:

ROSE AVENUE over SIRT SOUTH SHORE

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.57322, -74.11762
40°34'24" N, 74°07'03" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:ROSE AVENUE over SIRT SOUTH SHORE
Structure number:000000002249420
Location:IN NEW DORP
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:39.7 ft. [12.1 m]
Total length:75.8 ft. [23.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:34.1 ft. [10.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:17.1 ft. [5.2 m]
Skew angle:10°
Owner:Other Local Agencies [25]
Year built:1952
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,781 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:72.8 tons [66.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:42.9 tons [39.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:92.8
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$276,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201592.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood3781
August 201392.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood5216
August 201192.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good5216
August 200992.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good5446
November 200792.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good5216
November 200592.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good5216
October 200392.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good5216
July 200196.8Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good4248
August 199996.8Not deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory4248
August 199796.8Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory4248
September 199584.7Not deficientFairVery GoodFair2900
November 199384.7Not deficientFairVery GoodFair2900
September 199166.7Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair2900