Share:

HANNAH STREET over SIRT SOUTH SHORE

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.63623, -74.07471
40°38'10" N, 74°04'29" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:HANNAH STREET over SIRT SOUTH SHORE
Structure number:000000002249520
Location:IN TOMPKINSVILLE
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:35.8 ft. [10.9 m]
Total length:334.0 ft. [101.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:28.9 ft. [8.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:17.4 ft. [5.3 m]
Skew angle:11°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1935
Year reconstructed:1985
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:10
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:5,326 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:43.9 tons [39.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:26.0 tons [23.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:68.3
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$295,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
October 201568.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood5326
October 201373.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood5326
September 201175.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood5281
September 200975.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood5281
November 200775.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood5281
December 200575.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood5281
October 200375.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood5281
September 200191.3Not deficientGoodGoodGood2700
October 199991.3Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood2700
September 199780.3Not deficient-SatisfactoryFair2700
August 199563.3Structurally deficient-FairPoor2700
November 199382.7Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair2700
October 199177.7Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair2700