ARTHUR KILL ROAD over ARTHUR KILL STRM
Map
Coordinates:
+40.52003, -74.2398240°31'12" N, 74°14'23" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | ARTHUR KILL ROAD over ARTHUR KILL STRM |
| Structure number: | 000000002249820 |
| Location: | AT RICHMOND VALLEY |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
| Length of largest span: | 30.8 ft. [9.4 m] |
| Total length: | 40.7 ft. [12.4 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 36.1 ft. [11.0 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 48.6 ft. [14.8 m] |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1945 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 11,565 [as of 2007] |
| Truck traffic: | 13% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 70.1 tons [63.7 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 18.6 tons [16.9 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 46.8 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,253,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 4,000 [as of 1999] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge over "tidal" waters that has not been evaluated for scour, but considered low risk. [T] |
| Operating rating: | 67.8 tons [61.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 17.9 tons [16.3 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 61.7 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $540,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 4,000 [as of 1991] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 57.0 tons [51.8 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 22.3 tons [20.3 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 60.3 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $72,000 |