Share:

CHELSEA ROAD over SAWMILL CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.60813, -74.18861
40°36'29" N, 74°11'19" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CHELSEA ROAD over SAWMILL CREEK
Structure number:000000002249880
Location:1/4 MI N OF 440-EXIT 8
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Total length:52.8 ft. [16.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1997
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Latex Concrete or similar additive [3]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:1,791 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Inventory rating:74.8 tons [68.0 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:93.9
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$1,242,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201593.9Not deficientVery GoodExcellentExcellent1791
May 201394.0Not deficientVery GoodExcellentExcellent1258
May 201194.0Not deficientVery GoodExcellentExcellent1258
May 200995.1Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent880
May 200795.1Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent858
April 200594.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent1258
May 200394.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent1258
May 200198.9Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent400
June 199998.9Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent400
December 199798.9Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good400
May 199826.8Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious640
March 199726.3Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious640
June 199525.9Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious640
September 199425.9Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious640
July 199325.9Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious640
July 199243.1Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor640
September 199160.7Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor640