RTE 907A over RTE 908M


+40.68726, -73.72485
40°41'14" N, 73°43'29" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE 907A over RTE 908M
Structure number:000000002266770
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:88.9 ft. [27.1 m]
Total length:95.8 ft. [29.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:51.8 ft. [15.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:71.9 ft. [21.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:9.5 ft. [2.9 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1939
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Frame [07]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:154,332 [as of 2004]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:73.6 tons [66.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:25.2 tons [22.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:65.5
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$18,591,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201465.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood154332
March 201265.5Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryGood154332
March 201065.5Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryGood136589
March 200870.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood136589
April 200670.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood154332
May 200473.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood154332
July 200273.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood98984
May 200060.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory98984
June 199840.0Structurally deficient-PoorSatisfactory88502
June 199659.7Functionally obsolete-FairFair82953
April 199459.7Functionally obsolete-FairFair82953
May 199259.7Functionally obsolete-FairFair100000
June 199061.1Functionally obsolete-FairFair100000