Share:

RTE I278 over RTE I278, FURMAN STREET,

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.70084, -73.99475
40°42'03" N, 73°59'41" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE I278 over RTE I278, FURMAN STREET,
Structure number:000000002268497
Location:ADJACENT TO FURMAN STREET
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:60.7 ft. [18.5 m]
Total length:2328.9 ft. [709.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:33.5 ft. [10.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:37.1 ft. [11.3 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:13.8 ft. [4.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.8 ft. [4.2 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1944
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:45
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Frame [07]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:134,789 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:88.2 tons [80.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:32.3 tons [29.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:59.3
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$88,868,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201559.3Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory134789
August 201360.9Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory202650
August 201161.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory202650
July 200961.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory142088
September 200761.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory202650
June 200561.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory202650
June 200359.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory202650
June 200163.0Functionally obsolete-FairSatisfactory190745
August 199962.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory182039
June 199763.0Functionally obsolete-FairGood168300
April 199547.8Structurally deficient-PoorFair80971
February 199318.0Structurally deficient-SeriousFair167900
199376.0Functionally obsolete---84250