CAUTERSKILL ROAD over KAATERSKILL CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+42.21881, -73.9174542°13'08" N, 73°55'03" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | CAUTERSKILL ROAD over KAATERSKILL CREEK |
| Structure number: | 000000003200680 |
| Location: | 3 MI.W.VILL.OF CATSKILL |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 103.7 ft. [31.6 m] |
| Total length: | 108.9 ft. [33.2 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 17.4 ft. [5.3 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 18.4 ft. [5.6 m] |
| Vertical clearance above deck: | 9.8 ft. [3.0 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1921 |
| Year reconstructed: | 1970 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
| Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 70 [as of 2009] |
| Truck traffic: | 8% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 41.9 tons [38.1 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 29.9 tons [27.2 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 54.1 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $749,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 70 [as of 1999] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 48.8 tons [44.4 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 34.9 tons [31.7 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 45.7 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $451,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 70 [as of 1991] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 40.6 tons [36.9 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 28.7 tons [26.1 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 34.2 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $831,000 |