SCHILLNGS CROSSNG over STONY KILL
Map
Coordinates:
+42.41707, -73.4773842°25'01" N, 73°28'39" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | SCHILLNGS CROSSNG over STONY KILL |
| Structure number: | 000000003221980 |
| Location: | 1.6 MI W OF CANAAN |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 52.8 ft. [16.1 m] |
| Total length: | 57.7 ft. [17.6 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 14.8 ft. [4.5 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.7 ft. [5.1 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1949 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 200 [as of 2009] |
| Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 91.9 tons [83.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 63.9 tons [58.1 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 60.5 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $415,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 200 [as of 1999] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 91.7 tons [83.4 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 63.8 tons [58.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 61.5 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $217,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 200 [as of 1991] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 59.4 tons [54.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 22.3 tons [20.3 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 48.8 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $22,000 |