WEST SHORE ROAD over MILL NECK CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+40.90198, -73.5486940°54'07" N, 73°32'55" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | WEST SHORE ROAD over MILL NECK CREEK |
| Structure number: | 000000003300010 |
| Location: | AT BAYVILLE |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
| Length of largest span: | 89.9 ft. [27.4 m] |
| Total length: | 540.7 ft. [164.8 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 42.0 ft. [12.8 m] |
| Vertical clearance below bridge: | 11.8 ft. [3.6 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1938 |
| Year reconstructed: | 1993 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2] |
| Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Movable - Bascule [16] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 8,950 [as of 1985] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | In place and functioning [2] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
| Operating rating: | 61.6 tons [56.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 28.1 tons [25.5 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 63.8 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $9,604,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 8,950 [as of 1985] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | In place and functioning [2] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge over "tidal" waters that has not been evaluated for scour, but considered low risk. [T] |
| Operating rating: | 25.9 tons [23.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 16.0 tons [14.5 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 43.8 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $2,671,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 8,950 [as of 1985] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | None present but re-evaluation suggested [5] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 25.7 tons [23.4 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 15.8 tons [14.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 6.8 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $4,919,000 |