Share:

COLD BROOK ROAD over COLD BROOK

Map 

Coordinates:
+42.72482, -76.19535
42°43'29" N, 76°11'43" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:COLD BROOK ROAD over COLD BROOK
Structure number:000000003312220
Location:3.3 MI NW OF LITTLE YORK
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Collector (Rural) [08]
Length of largest span:26.9 ft. [8.2 m]
Total length:28.9 ft. [8.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Skew angle:40°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1932
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Arch - Deck [11]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:295 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection has failed. River control devices have been destroyed. Stream bed aggradation, degradation or lateral movement has changed the channel to now threaten the bridge and/or approach roadway. [3]
Scour condition:Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3]
Operating rating:75.5 tons [68.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:29.6 tons [26.9 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:66.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$302,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201566.0Not deficient-FairSatisfactory295
June 201365.8Not deficient-FairSatisfactory345
July 201165.8Not deficient-FairSatisfactory350
July 200965.8Not deficient-FairSatisfactory345
September 200779.9Not deficient-SatisfactorySatisfactory322
July 200579.9Not deficient-SatisfactorySatisfactory322
June 200379.9Not deficient-SatisfactorySatisfactory322
June 200181.2Not deficient-SatisfactorySatisfactory322
May 199981.2Not deficient-GoodSatisfactory322
May 199768.2Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryFair300
June 199550.5Structurally deficient-FairPoor300
June 199368.7Not deficient-FairFair300
May 199166.7Not deficient-FairFair300