Share:

BARNES HILL ROAD over CAYUTA CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+42.13912, -76.55680
42°08'21" N, 76°33'24" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:BARNES HILL ROAD over CAYUTA CREEK
Structure number:000000003331970
Location:4.4 MI S OF VAN ETTEN
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:95.8 ft. [29.2 m]
Total length:103.7 ft. [31.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:20.3 ft. [6.2 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1997
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Truss - Thru [10]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:114 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:58.9 tons [53.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.2 tons [32.0 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:76.8
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$1,010,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201576.8Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good114
October 201376.9Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good114
September 201176.9Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good110
September 200987.9Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good99
July 200776.9Not deficientGoodVery GoodVery Good111
July 200576.9Not deficientGoodVery GoodExcellent111
June 200376.9Not deficientGoodExcellentExcellent111
May 200176.9Not deficientGoodExcellentExcellent111
April 199976.9Not deficientGoodExcellentExcellent111
December 199776.9Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good120
August 199642.5Structurally deficientPoorSeriousPoor109
May 199541.6Structurally deficientPoorSeriousSerious120
June 199441.9Structurally deficientPoorSeriousSerious120
May 199341.9Structurally deficientPoorSeriousSerious120
May 199241.9Structurally deficientPoorSeriousSerious120
May 199141.9Structurally deficientPoorSeriousSerious120