RTE 915C over CHAMPLAIN CANAL
Map
Coordinates:
+42.93719, -73.6496142°56'14" N, 73°38'59" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | RTE 915C over CHAMPLAIN CANAL |
| Structure number: | 000000004029210 |
| Location: | .2 MILE E OF STILLWATER |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
| Length of largest span: | 179.8 ft. [54.8 m] |
| Total length: | 184.7 ft. [56.3 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 32.8 ft. [10.0 m] |
| Vertical clearance above deck: | 14.4 ft. [4.4 m] |
| Vertical clearance below bridge: | 19.7 ft. [6.0 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1959 |
| Year reconstructed: | 1993 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 3,653 [as of 1990] |
| Truck traffic: | 9% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 76.9 tons [69.9 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 45.9 tons [41.7 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 70.1 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $601,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 3,653 [as of 1990] |
| Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 76.8 tons [69.8 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 45.9 tons [41.7 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 67.0 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of relocation of road. [32] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $2,497,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for other load-capacity restriction [R] |
| Average daily traffic: | 3,653 [as of 1990] |
| Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 45.5 tons [41.4 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 28.5 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $433,000 |