SLAYTON SETTMT RD over ERIE CANAL, SOUTH TRAIL,
Map
Coordinates:
+43.20682, -78.5460543°12'25" N, 78°32'46" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | SLAYTON SETTMT RD over ERIE CANAL, SOUTH TRAIL, |
| Structure number: | 000000004454060 |
| Location: | 4 MI W JCT SH271 & CANAL |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
| Length of largest span: | 148.0 ft. [45.1 m] |
| Total length: | 191.9 ft. [58.5 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 14.1 ft. [4.3 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
| Vertical clearance above deck: | 13.8 ft. [4.2 m] |
| Vertical clearance below bridge: | 16.7 ft. [5.1 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1911 |
| Year reconstructed: | 1993 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 1,026 [as of 2009] |
| Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 83.2 tons [75.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.9 tons [32.6 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 69.8 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $2,609,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 1,028 [as of 1996] |
| Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 40.8 tons [37.1 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 24.9 tons [22.6 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 19.0 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of relocation of road. [32] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,932,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 620 [as of 1974] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | None present but re-evaluation suggested [5] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 22.8 tons [20.7 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 14.9 tons [13.5 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,307,000 |