RTE I95 over RTE 907F


+40.85650, -73.82653
40°51'23" N, 73°49'36" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE I95 over RTE 907F
Structure number:000000005066649
Location:1.4 MI NW I295 + I95
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Tolls:Yes, on Interstate toll segment under Secretarial Agreement [4]
Length of largest span:79.1 ft. [24.1 m]
Total length:209.0 ft. [63.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:124.7 ft. [38.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:128.0 ft. [39.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Toll Authority [31]
Year built:1958
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:132,748 [as of 2005]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:81.3 tons [73.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:48.7 tons [44.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:83.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$2,128,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201483.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodFair132748
July 201283.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodFair132700
July 201082.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodFair143147
July 200882.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodFair132399
June 200682.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair132438
June 200493.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory143147
July 200288.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory143147
August 200088.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory143147
May 199889.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory132709
May 199667.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairPoor144645
April 199465.6Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairPoor139843
November 199274.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryFair157459
October 199074.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryFair157459