Share:

RTE I95 over RTE 908A

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.86112, -73.82804
40°51'40" N, 73°49'41" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE I95 over RTE 908A
Structure number:000000005066652
Location:JCT I95+ HUTCHINSON R PKY
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:57.1 ft. [17.4 m]
Total length:117.1 ft. [35.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:47.9 ft. [14.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:52.5 ft. [16.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:12.5 ft. [3.8 m]
Skew angle:16°
Owner:State Toll Authority [31]
Year built:1940
Year reconstructed:1985
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Arch - Deck [11]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Latex Concrete or similar additive [3]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:64,038 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:60.6 tons [55.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:24.5 tons [22.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:63.6
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$6,574,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201463.6Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryGood64038
August 201263.6Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryGood69750
September 201050.0Functionally obsolete-FairGood148400
August 200850.0Functionally obsolete-FairGood148400
June 200650.3Functionally obsolete-FairGood148400
July 200450.3Functionally obsolete-FairGood72858
July 200249.6Functionally obsolete-FairGood72858
August 200049.6Functionally obsolete-FairGood72858
June 199859.6Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryGood72858
May 199633.4Structurally deficient-PoorFair72858
March 199452.5Functionally obsolete-FairFair72858
March 199252.5Functionally obsolete-FairFair58851
March 199061.1Functionally obsolete-FairFair58851