Share:

BAYCHESTERAV RAMP over RTE I95

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.87543, -73.83486
40°52'32" N, 73°50'05" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:BAYCHESTERAV RAMP over RTE I95
Structure number:000000005076070
Location:2.8 MI NW JCT I295 & I95
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:90.9 ft. [27.7 m]
Total length:95.1 ft. [29.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:28.9 ft. [8.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:50.5 ft. [15.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:55°
Owner:State Toll Authority [31]
Year built:1956
Year reconstructed:2002
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:10,695 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:68.5 tons [62.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:71.9
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$1,226,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201471.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory10695
August 201272.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory7200
August 201074.6Not deficientSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory7200
August 200874.6Not deficientSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory7200
August 200676.7Not deficientSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory7200
October 200476.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory7200
September 200275.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory7200
October 200075.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair7200
November 199875.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair7200
November 199659.2Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor7200
October 199441.7Structurally deficientFairFairPoor7200
October 199241.7Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor7200
September 199041.7Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor7200