Share:

HR 6 AND HR 11 over LOWER LEVEL

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.84907, -73.94136
40°50'57" N, 73°56'29" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:HR 6 AND HR 11 over LOWER LEVEL
Structure number:000000005522510
Location:SE JCT 95I & RTE 9A
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:53.8 ft. [16.4 m]
Total length:63.0 ft. [19.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:56.1 ft. [17.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:69.9 ft. [21.3 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:15.4 ft. [4.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:21°
Owner:Local Toll Authority [32]
Year built:1960
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:92.7 tons [84.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:77.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$977,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201577.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair-
July 201376.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair13126
July 201182.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair13126
July 200982.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair13126
July 200782.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair13126
July 200582.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair13126
August 200382.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair13126
September 200182.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair13126
August 199993.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood13126
September 199782.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodFair3277
September 199563.2Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor23000
November 199377.8Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair23000
July 199164.2Structurally deficientFairFairPoor23000