Share:

AJO OVERPASS over JICTCW RAMP, JICTCE RAMP

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.64510, -73.78458
40°38'42" N, 73°47'04" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:AJO OVERPASS over JICTCW RAMP, JICTCE RAMP
Structure number:000000005522640
Location:JFK INT AIRPORT
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:94.8 ft. [28.9 m]
Total length:638.8 ft. [194.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:23.0 ft. [7.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Owner:Local Toll Authority [32]
Year built:1989
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:9
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,743 [as of 1992]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:95.2 tons [86.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.9 tons [32.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:87.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$89,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201487.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood3743
June 201287.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood3743
June 201087.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood3743
May 200887.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood3743
May 200687.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood3743
July 200485.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood3743
June 200285.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good3743
May 200083.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodExcellent3743
June 199883.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good3743
July 199688.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery Good3743
July 199489.0Not deficientVery GoodSatisfactoryVery Good3743
July 199293.0Not deficientVery GoodSatisfactoryVery Good3743