RTE I278 over ARTHUR KILL
Map
Coordinates:
+40.63329, -74.1923640°37'60" N, 74°11'32" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | RTE I278 over ARTHUR KILL |
| Structure number: | 000000005523059 |
| Location: | I278 OVER AUTHUR KILL |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11] |
| Tolls: | Yes [1] |
| Length of largest span: | 336.0 ft. [102.4 m] |
| Total length: | 1152.0 ft. [351.1 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 39.7 ft. [12.1 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 44.3 ft. [13.5 m] |
| Vertical clearance above deck: | 19.7 ft. [6.0 m] |
| Vertical clearance below bridge: | 134.8 ft. [41.1 m] |
| Owner: | Local Toll Authority [32] |
| Year built: | 1928 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Number of main spans: | 5 |
| Main spans material: | Steel continuous [4] |
| Main spans design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 88,600 [as of 1992] |
| Truck traffic: | 13% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | In place and functioning [2] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 94.3 tons [85.7 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 26.8 tons [24.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 51.5 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $29,692,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 67,800 [as of 1990] |
| Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | There are no noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the channel. [9] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | In place and functioning [2] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge over "tidal" waters that has not been evaluated for scour, but considered low risk. [T] |
| Operating rating: | 92.7 tons [84.3 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 26.8 tons [24.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 45.6 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $7,155,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 67,800 [as of 1990] |
| Truck traffic: | 9% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 35.9 tons [32.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 7.5 tons [6.8 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $18,967,000 |