Share:

BLDG 59 DEPT RAMP over TAXICAB ROAD, BLDG 59 AR

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.64162, -73.78756
40°38'30" N, 73°47'15" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:BLDG 59 DEPT RAMP over TAXICAB ROAD, BLDG 59 AR
Structure number:000000005524290
Location:JFK BLDG 59 DEPART RAMP
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:87.9 ft. [26.8 m]
Total length:788.1 ft. [240.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:124.3 ft. [37.9 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Owner:Local Toll Authority [32]
Year built:1971
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:15
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:513 [as of 1987]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:42.1 tons [38.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:20.9 tons [19.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:59.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$5,523,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201459.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood513
July 201263.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood513
July 201063.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood513
August 200863.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood513
July 200663.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood513
August 200463.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood513
July 200263.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good513
July 200060.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good513
August 199860.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good513
August 199633.2Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor513
September 199450.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair513