Share:

R-DEP over CTCW RAMP

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.64500, -73.78500
40°38'42" N, 73°47'06" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:R-DEP over CTCW RAMP
Structure number:00000000552431C
Location:JFK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:89.9 ft. [27.4 m]
Total length:390.1 ft. [118.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:25.3 ft. [7.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Owner:Local Toll Authority [32]
Year built:2002
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:99 [as of 2002]
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:95.4 tons [86.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.9 tons [32.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:92.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$5,532,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201492.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory99
June 201292.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory99
July 201092.0Not deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory99
June 200893.0Not deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory99
June 200693.0Not deficientGoodGoodGood99
July 200493.0Not deficientGoodGoodGood99
July 200296.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent99