Share:

SR 79 over MOHAWK CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.28833, -82.08944
40°17'18" N, 82°05'22" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:SR 79 over MOHAWK CREEK
Structure number:1601563
Location:2.1 M N OF JCT SR 541
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Total length:43.0 ft. [13.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Skew angle:20°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1929
Year reconstructed:1985
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2015 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:531 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:57.8 tons [52.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.0 tons [31.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:71.6

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201571.6Structurally deficientFairFairPoor531
March 201439.3Structurally deficientFairFairPoor531
October 201239.3Structurally deficientFairFairPoor531
August 201139.2Structurally deficientFairFairPoor646
November 201039.2Structurally deficientFairFairPoor646
October 200940.2Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor646
September 200840.2Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor646
November 200740.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair598
November 200642.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory598
January 200642.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory598
October 200338.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory785
September 200138.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory785
September 199938.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory785
June 199838.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory785
June 199742.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory613
February 199642.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory613
February 199542.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory613
February 199484.2Not deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory613
December 199284.2Not deficientGoodGoodGood613
October 199184.2Not deficientGoodGoodGood440