TOWNSHIP ROAD 365 over MOHICAN RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+40.41167, -82.1783340°24'42" N, 82°10'42" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | TOWNSHIP ROAD 365 over MOHICAN RIVER |
| Structure number: | 1630016 |
| Location: | 200 FT WEST OF CAVALLO |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 104.0 ft. [31.7 m] |
| Total length: | 199.2 ft. [60.7 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 19.0 ft. [5.8 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1912 |
| Year reconstructed: | 1993 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
| Main spans design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Corrugated Steel [6] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 1 [as of 1993] |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 44.6 tons [40.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 78.5 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $376,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7] |
| Operating rating: | 44.6 tons [40.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 78.5 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $376,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 180 [as of 1978] |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 5.9 tons [5.4 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 5.0 tons [4.5 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 20.7 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $376,000 |