Share:

SR 6 over US 6

Map 

Coordinates:
+41.48861, -81.71972
41°29'19" N, 81°43'11" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:SR 6 over US 6
Structure number:1800841
Location:APPROX. 80FT W W45TH ST.
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:62.0 ft. [18.9 m]
Total length:127.0 ft. [38.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:47.9 ft. [14.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:60.4 ft. [18.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.8 ft. [4.2 m]
Skew angle:43°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1940
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:1,000 [as of 2002]
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:38.8 tons [35.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:23.2 tons [21.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:68.6
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$100,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201568.6Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood1000
June 201474.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory1000
August 201324.0Structurally deficientGoodSeriousFair1000
October 201224.0Structurally deficientSatisfactorySeriousFair1000
May 201175.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory1000
October 201075.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory1000
December 200975.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory1000
November 200875.5Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory1000
November 200762.5Functionally obsoleteGoodFairSatisfactory1000
June 200662.5Functionally obsoleteGoodFairSatisfactory1000
June 200562.5Functionally obsoleteGoodFairSatisfactory1000
September 200462.5Functionally obsoleteGoodFairSatisfactory1000
October 200362.5Functionally obsoleteGoodFairSatisfactory1000
November 200266.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory1000
November 200073.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory300
July 199973.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory300
August 199873.0Functionally obsoleteGoodFairSatisfactory300
December 199773.0Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood300
September 199673.0Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood300
July 199568.5Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood300
May 199479.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryGood300
April 199368.5Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood300
June 199268.5Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood300
April 199168.5Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood300