+41.47972, -81.75139
41°28'47" N, 81°45'05" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:US 6A over NSC,RTA76 NEAR W 98TH ST
Structure number:1801171
Location:0.95 MI E CORP LINE LAKWD
Purpose:Carries highway over railroad
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:86.9 ft. [26.5 m]
Total length:167.0 ft. [50.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:72.2 ft. [22.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:80.1 ft. [24.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:20.7 ft. [6.3 m]
Skew angle:60°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:2000
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:8,929 [as of 2004]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:106.9 tons [97.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:106.9 tons [97.2 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:95.9
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$250,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201595.9Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood8929
March 201493.8Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood8929
March 201291.8Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood8929
April 201191.8Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood8929
March 201091.8Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood8929
February 200991.8Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood8929
October 200791.8Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood8929
September 200691.8Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood8929
November 200591.8Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood8929
May 200491.4Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood10390
May 200391.4Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood10390
April 200278.4Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood10390
June 200078.0Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood18591
November 199722.5Structurally deficientPoorSeriousPoor18591
January 199722.5Structurally deficientPoorSeriousPoor18591
December 199522.5Structurally deficientPoorSeriousPoor18591
August 199422.5Structurally deficientPoorSeriousPoor18591
August 199322.8Structurally deficientPoorSeriousPoor17177
August 199222.8Structurally deficientPoorSeriousPoor17177
May 199146.1Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor17177