FULTON RD over I-71


+41.45528, -81.71444
41°27'19" N, 81°42'52" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:FULTON RD over I-71
Structure number:1805282
Location:.72 MI. N. OF JCT. US-42
Purpose:Carries highway overpass over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:91.9 ft. [28.0 m]
Total length:463.9 ft. [141.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:70.9 ft. [21.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:85.0 ft. [25.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:48°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1967
Year reconstructed:2003
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:6
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Latex Concrete or similar additive [3]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:25,052 [as of 2002]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:44.6 tons [40.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:32.9 tons [29.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:91.0
Recommended work:Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36]
Estimated cost of work:$1,500,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201591.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood25052
May 201390.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood25052
April 201290.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood25052
April 201190.9Not deficientGoodGoodGood25052
July 201090.9Not deficientGoodGoodGood25052
August 200990.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood25052
April 200890.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood25052
April 200788.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood25052
March 200688.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood25052
March 200588.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodVery Good25052
March 200488.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodVery Good25052
April 200388.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodVery Good25052
May 200261.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor25052
May 200178.3Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryFair25052
April 200082.5Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryFair100
July 199982.5Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryFair100
July 199882.5Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryFair100
July 199684.5Not deficientFairGoodFair100
July 199493.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory100
June 199393.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory100
August 199295.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory100
August 199195.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory100