CEDAR AVE over IR 90


+41.49833, -81.67306
41°29'54" N, 81°40'23" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:CEDAR AVE over IR 90
Structure number:1807862
Location:.41 MI. E. OF JCT. I-77
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:86.0 ft. [26.2 m]
Total length:159.1 ft. [48.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:44.9 ft. [13.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:57.1 ft. [17.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Skew angle:41°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1958
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Latex Concrete or similar additive [3]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,040 [as of 2002]
Truck traffic:14% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:44.6 tons [40.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:97.8

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201597.8Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood2040
June 201497.8Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood2040
November 201395.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood2040
November 201295.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory2040
November 201195.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory2040
July 201095.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory2040
March 200995.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory2040
December 200793.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory2040
November 200693.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory2040
August 200593.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory2040
December 200493.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory2040
December 200393.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory2040
September 200297.8Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory2040
August 200097.9Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory1000
September 199997.9Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory1000
June 199897.9Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory1000
July 199697.9Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood1000
November 199595.9Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood1000
May 199494.9Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood1000
May 199394.9Functionally obsoleteFairVery GoodVery Good1000
May 199295.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodVery Good1000
March 199194.9Functionally obsoleteFairGoodVery Good1000