SR-2 over OLD1739-I-90(CUY-90-1820


+41.51722, -81.67389
41°31'02" N, 81°40'26" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:SR-2 over OLD1739-I-90(CUY-90-1820
Structure number:1808222
Location:JCT. SR-2
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:69.9 ft. [21.3 m]
Total length:203.1 ft. [61.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:78.1 ft. [23.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:85.0 ft. [25.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1959
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Latex Concrete or similar additive [3]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2016 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:17,069 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:44.6 tons [40.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:93.5
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$150,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
November 201693.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood17069
November 201592.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodSatisfactory26720
August 201492.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodSatisfactory26720
November 201392.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodSatisfactory26720
October 201292.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory26720
June 201192.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory26720
October 201088.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory48750
September 200971.0Structurally deficientSeriousGoodFair48750
November 200873.3Structurally deficientPoorGoodFair48750
October 200773.3Structurally deficientPoorGoodFair48750
June 200673.3Structurally deficientPoorGoodFair48750
December 200575.6Functionally obsoleteFairGoodFair48750
December 200476.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodFair46070
November 200376.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodFair46070
December 200276.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodFair46070
June 200176.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodFair46070
August 200088.7Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory41860
August 199988.7Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory41860
June 199889.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory41860
November 199689.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodGood41860
May 199488.3Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory41860
May 199375.2Functionally obsoleteFairGoodFair47500
May 199287.4Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory47500
April 199187.4Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory47500