I-90 over CUY. RIV VALLEY-RTA45
Map
Coordinates:
+41.48222, -81.6916741°28'56" N, 81°41'30" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | I-90 over CUY. RIV VALLEY-RTA45 |
| Structure number: | 1809393 |
| Location: | .57 MI. E. OF JCT. I-71 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over highway, waterway, and railroad |
| Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11] |
| Length of largest span: | 400.0 ft. [121.9 m] |
| Total length: | 5078.3 ft. [1547.8 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 109.9 ft. [33.5 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 116.5 ft. [35.5 m] |
| Vertical clearance below bridge: | 14.4 ft. [4.4 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1959 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
| Number of main spans: | 9 |
| Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
| Main spans design: | Truss - Deck [09] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Other [9] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 119,420 [as of 2007] |
| Truck traffic: | 8% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Critical [2 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations (including piles) on dry land well above flood water elevations. [9] |
| Operating rating: | 20.8 tons [18.9 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 15.8 tons [14.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 19.0 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $7,300,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 133,044 [as of 1991] |
| Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations (including piles) on dry land well above flood water elevations. [9] |
| Operating rating: | 44.6 tons [40.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 51.0 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $7,300,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 146,640 [as of 1988] |
| Truck traffic: | 9% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations (including piles) on dry land well above flood water elevations. [9] |
| Operating rating: | 59.4 tons [54.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 50.0 |